Bill wrote: If I had sent you a slide showing
the state of the Israeli economy, it would have pretty much been an upside down
version of the numbers of deaths. Israelis are suffering, Israeli Arabs even
more, and the Palestinian Arabs still more. The link
below is from the BBC: *Political rows blast Israeli economy* <http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/1/hi/business/2380255.stm> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RE: changing habits after many years,
with hopes for a better future, some good news from Afghanistan: It’s
just a pilot program, but it’s the right sort of beginning. With a ceasefire, perhaps economic
development plans for Palestine and Gaza can also begin, as proposed last year
before Congress by a wealthy Israeli businessman practicing what he preaches in
Aqaba. See Statement by
Stef Wertheimer; jobs opportunity and economic stability bring
better hopes for peace than empty talk by those who have nothing more than more
violence to offer. KWC Also see Give Peace a Chance, a Wertheimer profile @ http://www.fastcompany.com/fast50_02/people/rewards/wertheimer.html. Excerpts: Afghans Trade Guns for Shot at a New Life: Disarmament Project in Province Serves
as Test for Country [In] the northern
province of Kunduz, Afghan and U.N. officials launched a long-awaited national
program to disarm tens of thousands of factional fighters, demobilize them from
their militia units and reintegrate them into civilian life. … In return, each fighter was handed a plastic ID
card that entitled him to $200, a change of civilian clothes, a box of food and
vocational training and
employment counseling in
such fields as land mine clearance, road construction and factory work. "I feel like I've
been let out of prison after a long time," exulted Nizamuddin, 35, a
hulking man who had just turned in an enormous mortar tube. "I have been
carrying a gun since I was 20, and I never learned to do anything else. People
in my village blame every crime on me. Now maybe I can finally get a job and
get married." …The
start of the program was delayed for months while reforms were carried out at
the Defense Ministry, giving its leadership -- once dominated by former militia
commanders from a single faction -- a more ethnically balanced and professional nature. Now, in theory, no ethnic militia
should object to handing over its weapons or decreasing its forces for fear
that a rival group will exploit this weakness …The crucial support for disarmament, however,
comes from Gen. Daud Khan, a former militia leader who is regional commander of
the Afghan Defense Forces. He is viewed as loyal to the Karzai government, and
he faces no threat from factional rivals that would justify clinging to his
weapons and troops. "I am
ready to demobilize 30,000 men in three provinces if the authorities ask
me," said Khan, 33, in an interview at his headquarters, where hundreds of
fighters were registering to disarm. "There are rumors that we mujaheddin [Islamic holy warriors] still
want to rule by the gun. We
want to prove we have a place in civilian society, and we want to set an example for the rest of the country." To ensure that the
fighters do not return to their former way of life, the United Nations has set up the Afghan New Beginnings Program, which will offer free job training and
placement for all demobilized forces. Unskilled men can learn how to operate
road repair equipment; officers with some education may receive help opening
small businesses. A few are expected to enlist in the new Afghan army. "These people
have had enough of
war. You can see
the elation and excitement on their faces," said James Grimshaw, a British
manager at the New Beginnings office, which is scheduled to open other branches
in half a dozen provinces where the disarmament program will begin in the
coming months. "This is not just about collecting weapons. It is about
turning people into permanently employable individuals." (end of excerpts) *********************************************************************** On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 07:58:36 -0700 "Karen Watters Cole"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes: Thanks,
Bill. For
others who didn’t explore the rest of the CSM report, here’s more, which gives
a bigger picture of the current debate about the ineffectiveness of current
policies. Even if the “People’s
Peace Plan” does not do anything more than gather more signatures, it raises
the level of awareness that the people most affected are losing faith in their
elected leadership to genuinely address peace negotiations. Personally, I find a grassroots
initiative a very positive, if desperate, sign for which to be hopeful. If they collect enough signatures
showing willingness to compromise on right of return and border/settlement
issues, it could encourage leadership to move forward, abandoning failed
policies. Let us be hopeful. “The UN News Center
reports that the text of the resolution, which had been introduced by Italy, on
behalf of the European Union, expressed the Assembly's "particular concern
that the route marked out for the wall under construction by Israel in the
occupied Palestinian territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, could prejudice future negotiations and make the two-state solution physically impossible to implement
and would cause further humanitarian hardship to the Palestinians." The CBC reports that Israel says it will continue with construction of the fence, regardless of the UN vote. Israel's Deputy Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert said the fence is needed to keep out Palestinian attackers. NPR
reports that the lack of progress on peace talks, and the continuing violence, mean that more Palestinians are
willing to look at the idea of a "one-state"
solution. The proposal causes fear among Israelis determined
to protect their country's Jewish majority, but supporters of the idea argue that current Israeli policies of "reoccupation" in
the West Bank are making it more likely. The idea of one-state for both
Israelis and Palestinians was most recently
championed by the late Edward Said, a
professor at Columbia University and perhaps the best known supporter of the
Palestinian cause.” Also
noted was a “Hollywood peace initiative”
where actors had signed up to tour Israel on behalf of peace negotiations,
sponsored by OneVoice
Israel. - KWC Bill wrote: I have added a power point slide that looks at
deaths since Sharon. What is of interest is that Israeli deaths are way up to.
He had gotten Israelis to believe that he came in to protect Israelis but the
awful truth is that he initiated the crises to dump Barak and to secure his
future through increased terror. Please see the Christian Science Monitor’s
Daily Update, October 22, 2003 for the rest of this: links are live Israeli
strikes launch debate about civilian casualties
@ http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/sept11/dailyUpdate.html |
- RE: [Futurework] Middle East bilateral peace plan Karen Watters Cole
- Re: [Futurework] Middle East bilateral peace plan wbward
- Re: [Futurework] Middle East bilateral peace plan Karen Watters Cole
- Re: [Futurework] Middle East bilateral peace plan Christoph Reuss
- Re: [Futurework] Middle East bilateral peace plan wbward