Thanks Pete, I knew I could count on you for immediate amusing response. I know it is easy to get a patent, but this is supposed to be a working model. OK, I'll stop wishing...
If you hear of anything genuine, let us know! Natalia ----- Original Message ----- From: pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 5:18 PM Subject: [Futurework] Motionless Electromagnetic Generator--patented > > On Thu, 13 Nov, Natalia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Perhaps some may remember my mention of Tesla's experiments with > >over-unity devices. > > Tesla was a very unfortunate case. I don't know whether it was > late-onset schizophrenia, or some sort of organic brain damage, > possibly due to decades of inhaling O3 in his HV arc generating > facilities. The trend to madness is quite evident in the records > of his yearly press conferences, which make increasingly grandiose > and absurd claims, while his demonstrations of his claims dropped > to zero very early on. He made a major advance in his youth with > the development of AC power and transformers, so people kept paying > attention, which is why we still have the press conference reports > to look at. Were he anyone else, they would have been ignored for > the nonsense which they are. It must have been all very sad. > > > We recently retrieved our files and revisited the > >website of Dr. Tom Bearden, > > I think you'll find the doctorate is bogus. He's one of hundreds > who are able to reproduce the defective behaviour of Tesla's > later years, but with a perfect absense of any of the actual > advances which characterized his youth. > > > http://www.cheniere.org > > >who, along with four others got a patent on their Motionless > >Electromagnetic Generator, U.S. 6362718, Mar.26, 2002. > >It was apparently replicated by Jean Louis Naudin in France. > > Patents are distressingly easy to acquire, since the demise > of the requirement of a demonstration of a working prototype. > There are whole websites dedicated to "patent absurdities". > Bearden is a notorious producer of such exhibits. His work > has no merit whatsoever. This crowd has been around for decades, > and they produce nothing but words. Apparently, that's enough to > bring them sufficient income to keep doing it. If there was anything > real in their nonsense, actual hardware would have made its way > into the world over 30 years ago. It hasn't because there's nothing > to it. > > [...snip silliness...] > > >Perhaps those amongst you with the technical expertise will enjoy > >tearing this one apart > > Not worth the trouble. Everyone with paper in the physical sciences > gets visited by an earnest Tesla-nut at some point in their lives, > usually early on, and wastes an hour or two drifting through the > vacuous verbiage that passes for "content" in their material. It > is interesting to note how not one adherent to this stuff has any > significant training in real science. that's because the math (what > microscopically little there is) is bogus nonsense, but seems to > be designed to impress the gullible. It's just another cult, like > UFO abductions, or Atlantis, or whatever. Great fodder for study > by psycho-sociologists, though. > > -Pete > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
