Brad,

I suppose this is a linguistic problem.

Free markets are part of free association. That should be pretty
obvious.

Jack and Jill were trying to beat each other to the top. That was
the sole purpose of the competition. Like Monday Night Football,
they are competing to win, no matter the concussions and broken
limbs. 

Free market competition has as its purpose the satisfaction of
the consumer by supplying higher quality goods at a lower price.
Whoever best succeeds will have won the competition. 

Interesting is that competing companies in the market may not
want to supply better goods at a cheaper price, but they must -
or they go broke.

Or they get the guvmint to protect them from bankruptcy - either
by internal regulations, or by import restrictions.. Thus are the
corporate monopolies protected from whom? Why, from the 280
million or so Americans, whose wishes are the last to be
respected.

And good people on this list who no doubt regard themselves as
reformers and do-gooders seem eager to support corporate
privilege at the expense of ordinary people.

I feel a bit like Sabatini's Scaramouche:

"He was born with a gift of laughter and a sense that the world
was mad."

Harry

********************************************
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
Tel: 818 352-4141  --  Fax: 818 353-2242
http://haledward.home.comcast.net
********************************************
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:13 PM
To: Harry Pollard
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] A glimpse of medieval Hangzhou and the
Song civilisation

Harry Pollard wrote:

> Brad,
> 
> George suggested in his Law of Human Progress that the Progress
of 
> Civilization depended on "Association in Equality".
> 
> In my courses I use the more positive term "cooperation" rather
than 
> "association" but I think association is better. Equality
doesn't mean 
> we are all the same, which would be nonsense, but that societal

> conditions for everyone remain the same.
> 
> Thus, insomuch as association is diminished and inequality
rises, so 
> does civilization decline. Do you think he might have been on
to 
> something?
[snip]

This sounds good to me, but I don't see what it has to do with
competition or "free markets", except insofar as in any
particular situation the cooperating persons may decide that
whatever kind and extent of competition would be beneficial to
all.

     Jack and Jill raced each other up the hill
     to fetch a pail of water.
     Jack fell down, but got up again
     to try to beat Jill to the top
     even though he broke his crown,
     and caused Jill to trip up and
     come tumbling after (she got back up too...).
     ...
     So, in the end, they got
     the pail of water
     even though, if it was not for the competition,
     they had both been too tired to get off their
     respective duffs and so would have gone thirsty.
     But, in their race to beat each other
     they completely forgot how tired they had been.

\brad mccormick


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.548 / Virus Database: 341 - Release Date: 12/5/2003
 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to