Hi Dominik, > * There is lots of markup in the examples which should not be > there (commands and command options).
It conveys extra information (about what is a builtin command). I consider it an improvement, but I can remove it if you feel strongly about it. > * All section headers look the same. For example, the header > "Command Execution" and the sub-headers "Module and Function > Commands" or "Delayed Execution of Commands" look exactly the > same. The sub-headers should be indented. Fixed. > * The standard man page section headers are not printed in > capitals as they should be (the format of GNU style man pages > is standardized), e.g. NAME, SYNOPSIS, DESCRIPTION etc. Partially fixed. > * The sections are not justified as they should be. Fixed. > * The first line of the man page does not contain the usual > information: > > FVWM(mansection) ... something ... FVWM(mansection) Fixed. > * There are some examples with long lines (> 80 characters) or > very funny formatting. Generally it looks like long lines > broken with \\ are not typeset correctly. Fixed. > * There is an inappropriate use of a single backtick in this line: > > undefine(`include') It's a verbatim copy of what's in the original man page. > * A lot of text has been removed from the BUGS section. That's definitely an improvement. > * THe section "command expansion" contains rubbish. I cannot reproduce this. Please let me know if you've still got this problem. Scott. :)
