Hi Dominik, > Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?
I'm happy for any of my contributions to be licensed using GPLv3. (not that permission is required with the "v2 or any later version" clause in the existing GPLv2 licence.) I'd like to see FVWM migrate to GPLv3 soon, allowing a reasonable time (~1 month?) for anyone to voice objections about relicensing their own contributions. (Even though legally we don't need to, it would be polite.) I suggest you forward your "GPLv3?" post to the fvwm mailing list as well. Scott. :)
