On 7/6/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dominik,
> Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?
I'm happy for any of my contributions to be licensed using GPLv3.
(not that permission is required with the "v2 or any later version"
clause in the existing GPLv2 licence.)
Me too.
I'd like to see FVWM migrate to GPLv3 soon, allowing a reasonable time
(~1 month?) for anyone to voice objections about relicensing their own
contributions. (Even though legally we don't need to, it would be
polite.)
I hereby grant the fvwm comitee the right to upgrade the license
version as they see fit, as long as it is remains a GPL license.
By the way, I guess I should update my contribution listing..
Cheers,
Renato Caldas
