On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:48:39PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > With the latest addition for allowing $[w.visiblename] expansion, > allowing a window's visible name to match as a valid identifier to a > style line is perhaps the biggest use case for this addition. See the > patch attached which implements this. > > I've made a concerted effort to not break how existing styles are > applied; in the general case, a window's visible name and actual name > are going to be the same. Where they diverge is in the use of > IndexedWindowName -- should such a string be used, either explicitly > from the user, or via $[w.visiblename] then make this match *before* > the window's proper name. > > Words to this effect are in the Changelog. I've updated NEWS as well this > time.
Applied, however: > diff -u -r1.3057 ChangeLog > --- ChangeLog 4 Oct 2008 22:35:21 -0000 1.3057 > +++ ChangeLog 5 Oct 2008 18:46:58 -0000 > @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ > +2008-10-05 Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > + * fvwm/style.c (fw_match_style_id): > + Allow for the window's visible name to be considered when matching a > + style line. Given $[w.visiblename] is mostly interesting when applying > + style, make it match before the actual window name is. Er, what? I don't understand the sentence. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt
