2008/10/19 Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:48:39PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: >> With the latest addition for allowing $[w.visiblename] expansion, >> allowing a window's visible name to match as a valid identifier to a >> style line is perhaps the biggest use case for this addition. See the >> patch attached which implements this. >> >> I've made a concerted effort to not break how existing styles are >> applied; in the general case, a window's visible name and actual name >> are going to be the same. Where they diverge is in the use of >> IndexedWindowName -- should such a string be used, either explicitly >> from the user, or via $[w.visiblename] then make this match *before* >> the window's proper name. >> >> Words to this effect are in the Changelog. I've updated NEWS as well this >> time. > > Applied, however: > >> diff -u -r1.3057 ChangeLog >> --- ChangeLog 4 Oct 2008 22:35:21 -0000 1.3057 >> +++ ChangeLog 5 Oct 2008 18:46:58 -0000 >> @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ >> +2008-10-05 Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> + * fvwm/style.c (fw_match_style_id): >> + Allow for the window's visible name to be considered when matching a >> + style line. Given $[w.visiblename] is mostly interesting when applying >> + style, make it match before the actual window name is. > > Er, what? I don't understand the sentence.
Heh. It's meant to explain that adding in matching of the window's visible name is either explicit, because that's what the user typed in the first place, or, it's done via $[w.visiblename] which before now wasn't possible until the patches I'd sent in. Feel free to reword it. -- Thomas Adam
