On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 06:04:48PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > I will of course be responsible for keeping this branch synched so that its > eventual merging with the tip of HEAD will be seamless [0]. > > -- Thomas Adam > > [0] This is CVS -- what am I saying? It's going to suck. :P Oh, if only > we were using Git...
It wouldn't be impossible to change over; CVS -> SVN -> GIT I know, I know, it would still be a huge and painful effort. Would it make sense to make a clean break with 2.60? Leave the old stuff in CVS, but on the 2.60 release, start with a completely new git repository containing just the released 2.60 code, and continue on from there? -- _--_|\ | Kathryn Andersen <http://www.katspace.org> / \ | \_.--.*/ | <http://kerravonsen.dreamwidth.org/> v | <http://kerravonsen.redbubble.com/> ------------| Melbourne -> Victoria -> Australia -> Southern Hemisphere Maranatha! | -> Earth -> Sol -> Milky Way Galaxy -> Universe
