On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:21:18PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:04:19PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 03:30:04PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > Would simply reverting the reindentation commit and postponing a
> > > > new round of reindentation be okay?
> > > 
> > > Yup; go for it.  :)
> > 
> > Done.  The new branch is named dv/undo-reindent.  Please double
> > check that I did not forget to include some files - had to redo
> > the renaming step from scratch.
> > 
> > Also, I've added several low level .gitignore files to ignore some
> > generated files.
> 
> Did you actually push your commits onto this branch, as I only see my own
> butchery there, and nothing from you?

I've redone the branch from the common base commit
63af0bc172a36ea35f223dce30790ddd5264269a using cherry-pick and
manual editing.  I've recycled your commit information.  The
following commits are actually by me but bear the old commit
information:

01885bc4172e42d92cb57840674e196d180cb7ef
23e6b9ce70079cd4755e39fe09a15bb0b6e7a9e8
3320850d941ec06ed38e8e5007744c4bf3f103e4

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt

Reply via email to