On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:01:39AM -0400, Peter G wrote:
> thanks taking the time to look at this, and for the pointers!

You're welcome.  :-)

> In the man time, could you please verify that it's best that I play with
> the cvs version of the code? (as opposed to say 2.6.5, or maybe the
> github's repo here https://github.com/ThomasAdam/fvwm)?

CVS would be ideal, but the code hasn't changed much, so pick the
source that is most convenient for you.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt

Reply via email to