On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:22:56PM -0400, Peter G wrote:
> >
> > can you make me a new log with the attached events.c please?  I'm
> > only interested in the part with the many ...NAME notifications,
> > before and after you kill the application.
> >
> > sure, attached.
> 
> around line 246 i skip a lot of the same events...
> 
> then after line 511 i kill maple.

I assume you mean line 411?

> ..things now come back quickly - seems you're "flushing" the left over
> events.

Hrm, I just added another flush call in the case XGetGeometry()
fails.  I wonder why that catches 26k events per atom, when before
the application was killed it weeded out only between 1 and 50
events per call.

When you run "top", you see only fvwm using a noticeable amount of
cpu, and not the application?

Tomorrow I'll write my own application that generates these events.
I hope with that I can debug the situation myself.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt

Reply via email to