On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 08:51:31PM -0400, Bob Woodside wrote: > Michael Han wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 10:48:38PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 03:40:26PM -0400, Bob Woodside wrote: > > > > > > > > Does anyone know a really good reason why the window list is > > > > reordered two different ways on a focus change, depending on > > > > whether the newly-focused window is ClickToFocus or MouseFocus? > > > > > > The distinction seems useless to me. No reason why two concurrent > > > approaches should be maintained. Perhaps its simply a Mwm > > > compatibility issue? > > > > I don't know where this comes from either, but I've always vaguely > > wished that ClickToFocus would use last-focus order and wondered why > > it didn't. It always seemed like a bug, but not one I could nail down > > enough to look into. > > I think, as Dominik suggested, that the idea of the two modes was > suggested by mwm, although it wasn't implemented quite the way mwm does > it; and, in any case, it's not consistent anymore, since you can have a > mix of mousey and clicky windows. I think using the last-focus order > universally would make a good deal more sense. > > Maybe we should solicit some votes...? I vote for the universal > last-focus order. Mike, I take it your vote would make 2 for that > approach. I suspect, from his previous comment, that Dominik would make > a third, but I'll let him speak for himself.
Make it three. My only concern is that the stable 2.4.1 release is not be the right place to do such changes. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
