On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 11:07:19AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hello, > > > > At present time the fvwm lib is used in a totally static way. > > Moreover, an external module should be compiled inside the fvwm > > source tree to take advantage of the libs. > ... > > Any way > > I do not know a lot of things on memory management (any good > > doc and better tool than top and free?). > ... > > So the difference is not big when you really use fvwm. > > > > So now the big question: should I finish the libtoolization of fvwm > > and commit the change? > > It doesn't seem to be buying us much. >
Hum, sorry, what do you mean exactly? It seems to me that you say something like ... "No" o:) but I am no sure. Olivier -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
