On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:35:14AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
> Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 11:07:19AM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
> > > Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > At present time the fvwm lib is used in a totally static way.
> > > > Moreover, an external module should be compiled inside the fvwm
> > > > source tree to take advantage of the libs.
> > > ...
> > > > Any way
> > > > I do not know a lot of things on memory management (any good
> > > > doc and better tool than top and free?).
> > > ...
> > > > So the difference is not big when you really use fvwm.
> > > > 
> > > > So now the big question: should I finish the libtoolization of fvwm
> > > > and commit the change?
> > > 
> > > It doesn't seem to be buying us much.
> > >
> > Hum, sorry, what do you mean exactly? It seems to me that you say
> > something like ... "No" o:) but I am not sure.
> 
> No, I don't mean "no".
> 
> I don't know if I read your data correctly,
> but it didn't look like it showed a benefit.

Yes, it seems that there are no memory benefit. I was surprised
by that. Does someone has an explaination?
However, a benefit is to have our libs public.

> I only mentioned that to make sure I was reading all those
> numbers correctly.
> 
> The reason I posted was to point out that you could get more
> detailed data.  Jason showed how to do that on Linux.
>

Yes, /proc/$PID/maps gives some info but I need to write
a script that make the memory computation (only mem adress
are given). I fail to found a linux utility that do the
same job than pmap on solaris.
 
> Why would you want to do this if there's no benefit?
> 
> Still, if you want to, I won't say no.
> 
> Why?
> 
> 1.  Because, in principle, I like shared libraries.
> 2.  If anyone doesn't like them, they can disable them.
>

I will wait an other advice.

Thanks, Olivier 
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to