On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:24:35AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:18:18AM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > Olivier: I guess you added that XClearArea() call. Do you know > > > of any other places in the menu code where you added similar > > > calls? We should continue to support direct gradient drawing > > > since they look a lot better this way (less blocky). > > > > > > > I do not think that there is an other place in the menu code > > where I added such clearing. I was not award that B/DGradient > > is drawn on the foreground. > > > > But what about redrawing the relevant part of the gradient > > in this case: in the place of the XClearArea put (around > > line 404 of menuitems.c (+ do paint_menu_gradient_background > > global (menus.c + menus.h) and pass mr in some way to > > menuitem_paint). > > [snip] > > I now remember why we are drawing in the foreground. It's not > because of the looks but because a potentially huge pixmap has to > be kept in XServer memory. I'm unwilling to add a lot of > additional code just for the benefit of the old B/DGradient > implementation. Should we just document that a few features do > not work with the old gradient code? >
As the fix is simple and does not change a lot of code, I've fixed old D/BGradient with xft fonts. Olivier -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
