On 03 Sep 2003 13:04:33 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote: > > On 03 Sep 2003 at 09:59:02 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > * It is practically difficult to score hundreds of logos at once > > > > Most of the logos are series of the same logo in various formats. > > Which makes it even more difficult since votes for different > logos of a serie should be count together. > > > > We have 3 (or in some rare cases more) best artists who get the largest > > > number of points. > > > > > > Second stage. Choosing 1 best logo. > > > > It may be problematic to make people vote twice. > > That's right. It might be too complicated since there are > two deadlines.
You don't need to get the deadlines too precisely. We didn't expect to get hundreds of logos back then. It is interesting that you say in another message that you don't have a time to create one good overview image, but still want to go with one stage voting that requeres a lot of clean-up work, literally going through all hundreds of images and splitting them in some cases and grouping them in other cases, so different variants appear as one logo. Much *much* harder than creating overview for every artist, which is already almost ready. Anyway, since it is you that do most of the work, your thoughts have more weight. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
