On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 05:34:38PM +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On 29 Sep 2003 at 17:09:18 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> > > > I think we need to start the voting process soon before
> > > > the logo artits get angry :-)
> > >
> > > I got hardly feedback for the actual voting page. You
> > > reported one problem I could not reproduce. Using the actual
> > > voting page voting should be possible. Could you please
> > > check if you can vote with the actual page?
> > >
> > > I don't think we should state any voting results during the
> > > voting time.
> >
> > What's the URL again?
>
> http://www.fvwm.org/logo-competition/logos/voting/
>
> You should see a page which shows a link to
>
> http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm-web/logo-competition/logos/voting
>
> where voting can be done. I could make an automatic
> redirection if it is wanted.
The page looks good. I see one typo:
> for logos taking part on the
^
in ___|
And I'd use the medium or dark gray tone as a default background.
I'm not sure whether we should vote in two stages or not. With
108 logos, there may be too few votes per logo on average.
Perhaps we should weed out 80% to 90% of the logos in the first
stage, then elect the best of the remaining logos in a second
stage.
I have an idea how to reduce the chance of cheating: We may
require that everybody votes for at least 20 logos. Cheating will
become very tedious. And since it is extremely unlikely to have
two voting sheets with exactly the same votes, it is easy to
discover cheaters with identical votes.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
