Hi there, On 30 Sep 2003 at 00:51:43 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You probably mean we can not avoid cheating completely. > Being unable to prevent it at all would be a sad prospect > :-) ;-) Right. I think forcing voters to vote for at least 20 logos might lead to wrong results. If I like only 3 logos I would like vote for 3 logos only. So if I have to vote for 20 logos I would spread randomly my other 17 votes over the remaining logos, which means that I have to vote for logos I don't like. > > After the voting time we may look through the votes and > > see if there are any suspicions. We may check domains > > and user names. > > (and a few other things we should not announce now) > > > But the question is if we find any suspicions what can > > we do. Shall we delete this votes? What if two people > > have similar email addresses? > > I'd add a comment to the voting rules that the voting > committee (whoever that is) may reject votes if there is > strong evidence that they are forged. I'll do that. > We can think about the details later. The important part > is to collect as many data as possible right from the > start (i.e. the complete mails should be archived). Actually there are not any mails. Currently the voter is asked to state its email address only. I store some further information about the voting access (IP, Browser, Hostname, ..) which may be used to detect cheating. Cheers, Uwe -- ,_, For personal reply/mail put "fvwm" (O,O) in the subject. ( ) Otherwise I won't receive your mail. --"-"---------------------------------------- -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
