Thomas Adam <> wrote:
> On 19 July 2012 22:11, Dan Espen <> wrote:
>> I'm guessing the other fvwm developers are okay with going to asciidoc?
> No.  I have an attempt at this, but it's not finished.  We either use
> groff or nothing, and I don't mean groff backported from some
> conversion tool.  If you don't know groff, start learning.
Ok :S ... not as punishment - only as exercise

Btw I used asciidoc to "show" my thoughts and examples only not to
check in.


Reply via email to