Sorry David I meant to reply-to-list on this.
Begin forwarded message:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:39:40 -0600
David Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its 2.5.12 but as I run Debian and Ubuntu I'd just assum stick with
> the system debs as opposed to installing local packages.
You must be running Breezy then. I know that "Dapper" (the 'unstable'
version of Ubuntu) has FVWM 2.5.14. If you grabbed the source and built
it on Breezy you wouldn't have to wait until Dapper is released.
OTOH, it's not hard to build FVWM from source (installs to /usr/local)
so you could remove the packaged version, build and install the
up-to-date fvwm-2.5.14 tarball all while keeping your current ~/.fvwm
untouched.
Anyway, that's what I would do on my own system, if this is your work
box then you're probably out of luck.
HTH,
Myles
--
I don't deserve this award, but I have arthritis and I don't deserve
that either.
-- Jack Benny
--
Anybody that wants the presidency so much that he'll spend two years
organising and campaigning for it is not to be trusted with the office.
-- David Broder
