In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =?ISO-8859-1?B?SmVz+nM=?= Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> > What I find really odd is that I'm running the exact same fvwm binaries >> > (fvwm 2.4.18 (or 2.4.20 - it doesn't matter)) [...] >I think he should upgrade. That is quite old.
Er, according to www.fvwm.org, 2.4.20 is the latest stable release.
