Hello Robert,
>Are you using RIP
No. Just static routes.
>Are you using the basic routing that comes with NT4
Yes
>(as opposed to the "better" router that's part
>of RRAS)
Is RRAS safe to use w/ Checkpoint? I could find no word on it one way or
the other so I just stuck with the basic NT routing. If it's safe to use
w/ Checkpoint I have no problem putting it on. Other then better RIP
support are there any other advantages to loading RRAS vs. the default
routing code? (i.e. will it gain me much or just be another thing to
potentially screw up?)
>If so, did you remember to set the <snip>
I'm not using RIP in this instance so I don't think this applies, but
thanks for the tip - I will file it away for future reference...
Thanks,
Eric
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
