Actually, I like partialSet(), its short, and obvious what it is. The
only complication could be if people thought it did a similar task to a
method called setPartial(), should one exist.
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
-- Jack Sleight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 21 August 2007, 04:33 PM +0100):
Since it's basically re-using a partial within a loop, what do you think
about calling it 'partialLoop' or 'loopPartial'? I think it would be
good to keep thenaming consistent with the functionality. Thoughts?
--
Jack
