-- Jack Sleight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 21 August 2007, 06:11 PM +0100): > Actually, I like partialSet(), its short, and obvious what it is. The only > complication could be if people thought it did a similar task to a method > called setPartial(), should one exist.
Since ZF makes so much use of accessors, I think having 'set' in the name would be confusing. Since you liked partialLoop() as well, let's go with that as it's only one character more than partialSet() and accurately describes what's happening. > Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > -- Jack Sleight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > (on Tuesday, 21 August 2007, 04:33 PM +0100): > > > Since it's basically re-using a partial within a loop, what do you think > about calling it 'partialLoop' or 'loopPartial'? I think it would be > good to keep thenaming consistent with the functionality. Thoughts? -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
