I had a look at Jurriƫn's Proposal in the current versions. As I could see, it looks very nice! Why don't we merge these two existing proposal instead of refactoring a third one? I think this is the better way, because this proposal already includes a lot of options and helpers which are realy useful. For example a database adapter and so on. Have a look at it :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Form-tf4719410s16154.html#a13694081 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Fo... Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Fo... Mark Maynereid
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Fo... Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Fo... Mark Maynereid
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Fo... Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Fo... Mark Maynereid
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Fo... Richard Shank
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Jim Scherer
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Alan Gabriel Bem
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form dinok
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Eric Coleman
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Roman1975
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Roman1975
- [fw-general] Zend_Form SiCo007
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form SiCo007
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Matthew Weier O'Phinney
- Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form SiCo007
