In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> , Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > > On 31/01/2008, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Simone Carletti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >> (on Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 11:19 PM +0100): >> > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ >> > Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic >> > >> > Additionally, you should consider I already talked with my >> friend about the >> > idea of a PHP porting and he was more than happy. >> > I guess license or permission is not really a problem. > >> Excellent -- I'll have somebody on the Zend team verify that >> this is a >> compatable license; I'm not sure what our policy is on >> attribution. > > Wouldn't the NonCommercial part be a problem? (As in: IIRC the New > BSD license allows commercial usage)
Share Alike is also more GPL than BSD. Also, it must be said there's a reason attribution was dropped from most BSD style licenses (i.e. it became a complete pain). I assumed by Simone's comments though that his friend was happy to change the license to something that was compatible. Kevin
