I contacted him and he said this is not really an issue. He can adapt the license or provide custom permission for such this derived work.
He hasn't posted here an answer yet because - he said - "my English is not really understandable". :) On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Kevin Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > , Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > > > > > On 31/01/2008, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Simone Carletti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >> (on Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 11:19 PM +0100): > >> > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ > >> > Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic > >> > > >> > Additionally, you should consider I already talked with my > >> friend about the > >> > idea of a PHP porting and he was more than happy. > >> > I guess license or permission is not really a problem. > > > >> Excellent -- I'll have somebody on the Zend team verify that > >> this is a > >> compatable license; I'm not sure what our policy is on > >> attribution. > > > > Wouldn't the NonCommercial part be a problem? (As in: IIRC the New > > BSD license allows commercial usage) > > Share Alike is also more GPL than BSD. > > Also, it must be said there's a reason attribution was dropped from most > BSD style licenses (i.e. it became a complete pain). > > I assumed by Simone's comments though that his friend was happy to > change the license to something that was compatible. > > Kevin >
