Not sure why I said MIT, since I had the license right in front of me and it clearly says "New BSD License"... but thanks for the reply.
If anyone has an opposing opinion, let me know... On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/28/08, Jordan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm developing a distributable application that will be > > using/including the Zend Framework. I was planning on releasing the > > application with a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 > > License. Does anyone know if this is compatible with the MIT license > > that ZF is using? > > ZF isn't MIT. It's BSD with no advert. Although AFAIK they are > logically identical. > > Since BSD is pretty much a "do whatever you want" license then it is > basically compatible with everything. Go for it. > > In fact I think you could even take ZF and s/Zend/Jordan/g and call it > "Jordan's Framework". For a while the Linux guys were taking FreeBSD > drivers and just ripping out the BSD license header and putting in the > GPL header. But I think they stopped doing that because the BSD people > became very annoyed. And rightly so since it was effectively a > one-way-street because they could not bring any GPL'd patches back > into FreeBSD. > > Mike > > -- > Michael B Allen > PHP Active Directory SPNEGO SSO > http://www.ioplex.com/ > -- Jordan Moore - Creative Director Sanctus Studios LLC PO Box 2202 Tacoma, WA 98401 (253) 238-8676
