On 4/20/08, Joó Ádám <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'An additional "static salt" does not help unless the attacker has the
>
> password database but not the "static salt" which is also not very
>
> likely.'
>
>  I don't really know why do you think that this is unlikely to happen.
>  Think about an SQL injection attack, which reveals the users table,
>  but leaves the PHP code / INI config / etc. untouched.

True. But the static salt still isn't worth it IMO.

Mike

-- 
Michael B Allen
PHP Active Directory SPNEGO SSO
http://www.ioplex.com/

Reply via email to