Yeah I think that's a given re: incurring performance vs. ease. That's why I think ZF MVC is still valuable and ground-breaking, it makes programmers start thinking about drying up code and the added benefits of certain design patterns. I guess this is what you were trying to get at all along Eric - hehe. I like the fact that I have the ability to customise my own pattern. There are certain things I absolutely hated in my old design methods ie. layouts, templates, and the organisation of site logic. These are things that ZF has forced me to rethink.
So I get it now...I guess. Heh. On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Eric Marden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would however like your input on ZFs performance. > > Frameworks do encur a small performance penalty for the sake of > programming convenience. However, these performance hits are easily overcome > with the right hardware. This is not just ZF, but all frameworks I've used. > It may seem like overkill, but not when looked at as the sum of its parts. > > > -- > Eric Marden > -- David Di Biase
