wllm wrote: > > Why haven't you reviewed the Zend_Tool proposals? >
Well, the first thing I notice is that the proposals aren't filed under "Ready for Review!" They're filed under "New", which is honestly where they should be at this stage, because the proposals are far from complete. Zend_Tool_CodeGenerator: - nothing written under Requirements and Acceptance Criteria (only that it should use Zend_Reflection, which is an implementation detail, not a requirement) - nothing written under Use Cases - nothing written under Class Skeletons Zend_Tool_Project: - only two lines under Requirements and Acceptance Criteria - only one Use Case written - nothing written under Class Skeletons Zend_Tool_Rpc: - only four lines under Requirements and Acceptance Criteria (two of which are "will not" exclusions) - nothing written under Use Cases - nothing written under Class Skeletons Regards, Bill Karwin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-haven%27t-you-reviewed-the-Zend_Tool-proposals--tp18221384p18249243.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
