Caching metadata gives little performance boost. In my tests ( http://zfsite.andreinikolov.com/2008/08/zend_db_table-time-overhead-about-25-percents/ article is here ) the results showed 9.2 requests per second without metadata cache and 10.2 requests per second with APC metadata cache, so about 11%
Jason Webster wrote: > > Have you tried caching the table metadata, so it doesn't have to > regenerate it on every request? > <http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.db.table.html#zend.db.table.metadata.caching> > > Philip G wrote: >> >> It would be good to get some DB table benchmarks in there. I found >> Zend_Db_Table_Abstract() to be the slowest piece of all the components >> I've used. So much so, I've pretty much vowed off it, using >> Zend_Db_Select(), until things can improve. >> >> --- >> Philip >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> http://www.gpcentre.net/ >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Graham Anderson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> Article: http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315 >> >> For you lazies... >> >> framework | avg | rel >> ------------------+----------+-------- >> baseline-html | 2309.14 | 1.7487 >> baseline-php | 1320.47 | 1.0000 >> cake-1.1.19 | 118.30 | 0.0896 >> cake-1.2.0-rc2 | 46.42 | 0.0352 >> solar-1.0.0alpha1 | 154.29 | 0.1168 >> symfony-1.0.17 | 67.35 | 0.0510 >> symfony-1.1.0 | 67.41 | 0.0511 >> zend-1.0.1 | 112.36 | 0.0851 >> zend-1.5.2 | 86.23 | 0.0653 >> zend-1.6.0-rc1 | 77.85 | 0.0590 >> >> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FYI%3A-new-php-framework-benchmarks-tp19257910p19266832.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
