Yeah, this is more or less what you'd need to implement.
Off the top of your head, can you think of what "development time" tasks should be exposed? What will the tool be doing for the developer?
-ralph Matthew Lurz wrote:
I think a Zend Tool Project Provider is what I may be looking for instead. Matthew Lurz wrote:Thanks Josh. I hadn't thought of those and that's exactly the kind of input needed to get a handle on the potential scope. Josh Team wrote:I'm an avid user of both ZF and Doctrine. Time is short on my end but I can help here and there. Two things I've done with ZF & Doctrine is merge Doctrine with Lucene Search w/ Doctrine listeners that update the index on save/insert/delete. I've also merged Doctrine with Zend_Amf to allow remoting to interact right with the ORM layer. There are a lot of other possible touch points like, Zend_Navigation - Zend_Acl - etc.. where we could merge the two frameworks. On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Lurz <[email protected]> wrote:Thanks Jason!! Clearly others, such as yourself, have exerted more effort than I in creating proposals, etc. I only hope to help in whatever way possible. Feel free to interject, but a tentative plan to move forward might look something like: 1) Gather momentum and get a few dedicated people on board 2) Analyze/review potential integration points and agree on the initial scope of the library 3) Gather/modify/normalize existing/proposed components 4) Implement additional components within the initial scope 5) Provide a roadmap for enhancements taking into consideration changes to the ZF and Doctrine I'm assuming that you've gone through the process of signing the CLA, etc? I have not and so would need to review this information and go through the necessary process. Thanks again for the feedback. Let me know if you have any other recommendations, ideas, etc. Jasone wrote:I am able, and have the time, to do this. I authored two of those proposals. Been waiting on the zend team :) (Or now that I look, maybe they're not moved to "ready for review" yet?) Jason On May 8, 2009 6:16pm, Matthew Lurz <[email protected]> wrote:!!! Calling All Doctrine/ZF Users !!!While the ZF wiki contains several Doctrine related proposals, there doesn't seem to exist a cohesive movement toward tying together these 2 excellent pieces of software. With the benefits of doing so being so great, let's band together for this purpose!If you are a potential recipient of these benefits, would you be interested in using or contributing to the development of such an integration library?If so, read on and reply..A brief survey of potential integration points (1) turned up:ZendX_Doctrine_Application_Resource_Manager (2)ZendX_Doctrine_Tool_Framework_ClientZendX_Doctrine_Log_Writer_TableZendX_Doctrine_Session_SaveHandler_TableZendX_Doctrine_Auth_Adapter_Table (3)ZendX_Doctrine_Paginator_Adapter_Collection (3)ZendX_Doctrine_CodeGenerator_Form (3)---It wasn't my intent to define scope or vision, but the general intent of each should be somewhat self-evident.Integration points moving in the other direction exist as well. I've yet to evaluate these relationships, but one possibility is Doctrine event listeners using Zend_Log for profiling, debugging, etc.Have I missed any potential integration points? Any other comments?1) ZendX_Doctrine is the proposed namespace 2) I have some very basic, working code if anyone is interested 3) Proposal exists on ZF wiki -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-ZendX_Doctrine-tp23454552p23454552.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-ZendX_Doctrine-tp23454552p23455034.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
