oh i always thought Zend Server was a replacement for Apache ... with bundled MySQL etc so it becomes something like WAMP/MAMP except apache is replaced with something else. hmm i guess i shld use Zend Server with IIS then since its faster ...
but hmm but anything i shld know abt the differences between PHP on Apache vs IIS and intergration of each with Zend Server? i think 1 of them is IIS cannot do htaccess? but thats for anothrer topic ... i think? http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Server-in-Apache-vs-IIS-to23850691.html Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: > > -- iceangel89 <[email protected]> wrote > (on Wednesday, 03 June 2009, 01:30 AM -0700): >> thanks all, i will try looking at the performance guide ... also try Zend >> Server - so its better than Apache - guess because it "naively" supports >> ZF? >> but IIS even faster?? haha i thought its supposed to run ASP? so probably >> PHP will be slower ... haha > > Actually, your understanding of Zend Server is a bit incorrect here. > > Zend Server is an application stack, consisting of Apache, PHP, and on > some of the offered operating systems, MySQL. It also bundles Zend > Framework as well as the PEAR/PECL installers. > > ZS for Windows bundles Apache, but if you have IIS installed, it will > integrate with IIS instead. > > Microsoft has actually been doing a ton in the last couple years to make > PHP support on Windows first-class, and it runs incredibly well -- and > fast -- on that OS. Zend Server merely assists in the installation and > setup of your stack. > > >> Mon Zafra wrote: >> > >> > Do you have an opcode cache in place? It dramatically increases >> > performance. >> > Since this is Windows, try the free version of Zend Server. My Windows >> > setup >> > with Zend Optimizer+ is much faster than my Ubuntu setup (on the same >> > machine) with APC and FastCGI. It will probably be even faster if you >> use >> > IIS instead of Apache. >> > >> > -- Mon >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:26 PM, iceangel89 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> i know this maybe a wrong forum to post this but i like to know what >> >> PHP/ZF >> >> developers think abt this >> >> >> >> i just develop a web app that was supposed to be a replacement for a >> >> school's inventory management system which was originally developed in >> MS >> >> Access. i was quite embarassing actually ... after developing the >> system, >> >> i >> >> feel that the web app although may fullfil the clients requirements >> abit >> >> better, fix some bugs in the old system, has better features like >> search >> >> etc... >> >> >> >> i feel the access 1 was much faster even tho the data is the same ... >> >> isit >> >> because i didnt optimize my code well enough? but the difference is >> quite >> >> significant ... like maybe even arnd 5x slower in some cases. the >> >> "production" machine was P4 1.6GHz 256MB RAM but i am comparing in the >> >> same >> >> PC ... i did notice also that windows apps like C#/WPF/MSSQL is much >> >> faster >> >> as in like data binding ... isit becos PHP/MySQL is like on a server >> even >> >> if >> >> its localhost is slows things down? >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/-General--Windows-vs-Web-Apps-tp23831570p23831570.html >> >> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/-General--Windows-vs-Web-Apps-tp23831570p23847531.html >> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- > Matthew Weier O'Phinney > Project Lead | [email protected] > Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-General--Windows-vs-Web-Apps-tp23831570p23850699.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
