Hello,
Does elimination of underscores corresponds only to protected or private too?
Because IMHO underscores should be removed from protected methods only.
So private should have one underscore prefix. Such convention will allow to:
1. Absolutely clearly see that method is not a magic one (silly, but
still good point)
2. Have private and protected method doing something with similar name but
different scopes:
class MyClass
{
private function _doSomething()
{ /* ... */ }
protected function doSomething()
{
// protected doSomething mangling some results by default
return strtolower($this->_doSomething());
}
private function _doSomethingThatDataSensitive()
{
$data = $this->_doSomething();
}
}
But I mght be wrong and this will just make rules too complex. Anyway I vote for
underscores removal :))
2010/8/13 Vincent de Lau <[email protected]>:
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: Matthew Weier O'Phinney [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Verzonden: vrijdag 13 augustus 2010 18:27
>> Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Onderwerp: Re: [fw-general] Re: [zf-contributors] Poll: Should underscore
>> prefixing of non-public elements be dropped?
>>
>> -- D. J. <[email protected]> wrote
>> (on Friday, 13 August 2010, 11:16 PM +0800):
>> > BTW, I would like to let you know that the vote link is blocked in my
>> > country in case you don't think votes from my country don't make
>> > difference.
>>
>> Can you try going to the canonical URL, then:
>>
>>
>> https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dEZOTGpMdjhzZDlmZGNMZVF0WnFTV
>> 2c6MQ
>>
>> If you cannot reach that, let me know.
>
> Vote by mail ;)
>
> Vincent
>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Aleksey V. Zapparov A.K.A. ixti
FSF Member #7118
Mobile Phone: +34 617 179 344
Homepage: http://www.ixti.ru
JID: [email protected]
*Origin: Happy Hacking!
