-- ctoomey <[email protected]> wrote (on Tuesday, 12 April 2011, 05:11 PM -0700): > I was thinking more of user-contributed components (ala Zend_*) that > user-contributed modules, since they'd generally be much more > self-contained and easily reusable than full MVC modules.
This would be fairly easy to accomplish, and provide a nice sandbox for components prior to proposal for inclusion in the framework proper. Such a site would need some way of rating and commenting, and packages would need to likely have a specific format indicating ZF (and/or 3rd party) dependencies. > As far as user contributions being restricted by employers, that could we be > an issue, but I wouldn't think any more so than for the other > frameworks/CMSes which have healthy such repositories. > > I haven't yet used ZF enough to know whether the existing set of zend > components is so comprehensive as to minimize the need for other generic > components, but I'd be surprised if that were the case (and Matthew > indicates they've considered the idea of contrib repository). > -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Project Lead | [email protected] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/ PGP key: http://framework.zend.com/zf-matthew-pgp-key.asc -- List: [email protected] Info: http://framework.zend.com/archives Unsubscribe: [email protected]
