> going back in and checking the questions I had voted on. If they had more than 10 up-votes, I removed my up-vote and found another question I thought was appropriate and voted it up. That's a very clever thing to do. I'll try to do that too...
2012/3/14 H Glenn Hatfield <[email protected]> > I don't know if it's the right way to do it or not, but I've been going > back in and checking the questions I had voted on. If they had more than 10 > up-votes, I removed my up-vote and found another question I thought was > appropriate and voted it up. We technically have enough people registered > to make it to the next round if none of the questions go above 10 up-votes > and we are able to consolidate the votes onto the 40 most deserving > questions. > > H > > On Mar 14, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Tomáš Fejfar wrote: > > I missed MWOP's How can I propose new functionality for the framework? > > > 2012/3/14 Tomáš Fejfar <[email protected]> > >> Yes, but look at the question selection - 97% of them are stackexchange >> on-topic. The only two obvious offtopic are those I posted :)) It seems >> like a good idea to add such questions to the list to show that many of ZF >> related questions are SE offtopic. >> >> >> 2012/3/13 Jurian Sluiman <[email protected]> >> >>> Op 13 mrt. 2012 21:57 schreef "Tomáš Fejfar" <[email protected]> >>> het volgende: >>> >>> > >>> > Because you can ask a ton of questions that are about drupal and will >>> be marked as offtopic on StackOverflow. Like "How do I create a subpage for >>> a page in Drupal" or "What are good texts for html_description in Drupal", >>> etc. >>> >>> Please bear in mind you'll get the same type of question with the >>> to-be-created module ecosystem for zf2. I see this q&a for all kind of >>> questions, not all of them will be programming (and thus for SO) related. >>> -- >>> Jurian Sluiman >>> >> >> > >
