I pay something like $15 a month for 1500 minutes (anywhere in the US/Canada, including "local" calls) and a local number. But then I barely use my "landline".
I also run it over FIOS, and it works fine. NRY On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:38 -0500, Michael Krisher wrote: > I think I pay something like $25 a month for unlimited calling to the > United States and Canada and have a local number. > > -- Mike > > On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:22 PM, Alvin Manz wrote: > > > How much does Vonage cost per month? > > > > Bud > > > > Alvin (Bud) Manz, Jr. > > Programmer I > > Northwest State Community College > > http://www.northweststate.edu/ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > (419) 267-1459 > > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/06 3:09 PM >>> > > I'm on FIOS (two months or so) and am using Vonage for VOIP and it > > works great. Actually might be better than on DSL previously. > > > > -- Mike > > > > On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Brendan J. McGauran wrote: > > > > > I'm sorry I've missed the last couple of meetings but Thursday is a > > > bad > > > night for me. I'm going definitely try to make it on the 16th > > > > > > Is everybody that switched to FIOS still happy with the service? > > > Also anyone > > > running VOIP with FIOS. What provider are you using? I have a buddy > > > in CA. > > > that has Sunrocket. For $200 bucks a year he has unlimited calls to > > > the US > > > and Canada, voice mail, call forwarding etc. > > > > > > Brendan J. McGauran > > > > > > This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) > > > named > > > above and may contain information that is confidential, > > privileged or > > > unsuitable > > > for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of > > > humor or > > > irrational political and or religious beliefs. If you are not the > > > intended > > > recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email > > > is not > > > authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an > > > irritating > > > social > > > faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its > > correct > > > context > > > somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or > > > grammatical > > > use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission > > > of this > > > email, although electricity was used that required the > > cooperation of > > > special > > > interest groups such as oil and utility companies. Those of you > > > with an > > > overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that > > > there is no > > > > > > hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just > > > ignore > > > that > > > Alert Notice from Microsoft. If you have received this message in > > > error, you > > > may > > > not enjoy it without feeling guilty. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Fwlug mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fwlug mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org > > _______________________________________________ > > Fwlug mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Fwlug mailing list > [email protected] > http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org > _______________________________________________ Fwlug mailing list [email protected] http://fortwaynelug.org/mailman/listinfo/fwlug_fortwaynelug.org
