Simon Drabble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It might be instructive to have the lowest scores per hole published -- just
> the scores, not the golfer. I'm stuck at a pathetic 126[0] and would like
> something to aim at for my higher-scoring holes.
>
>
> [0] - doing better than I'd expected being new to this sort of thing.
>
> Si.
> Wondering what's wrong with his swing.
Well, if the tricks I've had to pull to get down to 92 strokes are
anything to go by you *really* don't want to know. I'm starting to
feel dirty.
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
