En réponse à Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:43:38PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote: > > Seems that it can be extended to arbitrary operators without losing > > any conciseness: > > So, who's gonna go to the obvious next level and give us an ofuscated > FORTH implementation, plus a decent JAPH in FORTH?
Well... That was the reason why I first tried to program a RPN 4 operation calculator in december. And then I tried to look at forth.org, and discovered that I had a lot to add to + - * and /... ;-) That's still in my list of projects, though. You can also checkout http://paris.mongueurs.net/aplusplus.html (in French) for various transmogrifications of $a++, including severel bilingual obfus: Perl/Forth, Perl/PostScript, Perl/Pytthon and Perl/Lisp... -- Philippe BRUHAT - BooK When you run from your problem, you make it that much harder for good fortune to catch you, as well. (Moral from Groo The Wanderer #14 (Epic))
