Philippe Bruhat (BooK) said:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
Wow, nice to se something happening on this list. :)
Would anyone like to rate my old JAPH below? (Don't know how to
rate it, but maybe it can be fun to figure that out... ;)
Rating JAPH seems very difficult. One could rate asbtract things
like creativity, beauty, or give bonus points for not using sigils,
or eval, or malus points for using modules.
Oh well, it can't be more difficult than rating art. Only maybe just
as difficult. ;-)
Of course it's difficult, that's why it's fun. :)
Also, I think it's nice to be subjective about such things. So what if
the code is impermeable for some (that just means there's more
weirdness to learn ;)
- Salve
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
sub AUTOLOAD{$AUTOLOAD=~/.*::(\d+)/;seek(DATA,$1,0);print# Salve Joshua Nilsen
getc DATA}$"="'};&{'";@_=unpack("C*",unpack("u*",':4@,$'.# <s...@foo.no>
'2!--"5-(50P%$PL,!0X354UC-PP%/0\`'."\n"));eval "&{'@_'}"; __END__ is near! :)
