On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:46 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> unfortunately no. that's why i updated the jars from known sources and
> ensured that all of them have version #'s.

I would say we should just leave it for now unless you have a burning
desire to fix the (likely) resulting problems ;)

/Sam

> -- dims
> 
> 
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:42:13 -0600, Samuel Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:15 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > Sam,
> > >
> > > I see a 1.0.1 version of OpenSAML. Should we upgrade to it? that zip
> > > has the dom3 versions of xerces/xalan. which version of SAML do u need
> > > for your work?
> > 
> > I believe we still don't yet use any of the SAML related code in WSS4J,
> > so upgrading to a new version should be fine but may require some work.
> > Do you remember what the version of the current jar is?
> > 
> > /Sam
> > 
> > > thanks,
> > > dims
> > >
> > --
> > Sam Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago
> > 630-252-1752
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
-- 
Sam Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago
630-252-1752


Reply via email to