nope...zero desire to upgrade. let's leave it as is. thanks, dims
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:49:30 -0600, Samuel Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:46 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > unfortunately no. that's why i updated the jars from known sources and > > ensured that all of them have version #'s. > > I would say we should just leave it for now unless you have a burning > desire to fix the (likely) resulting problems ;) > > /Sam > > > -- dims > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:42:13 -0600, Samuel Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:15 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > Sam, > > > > > > > > I see a 1.0.1 version of OpenSAML. Should we upgrade to it? that zip > > > > has the dom3 versions of xerces/xalan. which version of SAML do u need > > > > for your work? > > > > > > I believe we still don't yet use any of the SAML related code in WSS4J, > > > so upgrading to a new version should be fine but may require some work. > > > Do you remember what the version of the current jar is? > > > > > > /Sam > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > dims > > > > > > > -- > > > Sam Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago > > > 630-252-1752 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Sam Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago > 630-252-1752 > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
