>Hi all, Im upgradeing to OSX and want any opinions about Virtual PC 2000 for
>use with OSX, I have a G4 350 AGPx2,Is anyone doing OK with this
combination?? trouble?? thanks for the help in advance.

Here are the answers I got on the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to 
a similar question .

Rodd



At 2:53 PM +1000 6/12/02, Les Posen wrote:
>VPC-win2000 requires more memory it runs faster and with less trouble
>than VPC-win98. (I heard this after buying VPC-win98). A possible source
>for additional info on this topic is <http://www.macwindows.com>.
>
>>>>>BTW, a neat and useful feature of VPC is that the entire Windows
>environment is contained in a virtual disk image file on the Mac, so it
>is easy to make a backup of this one file before installing new Windows
>software within VPC. If something goes wrong with an install that
>trashes Windows, the backup disk image file can replace the trashed
>Windows environment.
>
>
>Actually, the fastest version is still W95! But, given the choice, the
>reviews I have seen on the Connectix forum site from those who seem to know
>is that on a fast Mac go with W2000. Concensus is that despite the bloat it
>is more stable, and a better match for VPC than W98. There has also been
>some discussion about speeding up VPC by getting rid of the help file, and
>experimenting with memory allocation. Some suggest there is such a thing as
>too much memory for Windows! Go read - it is quite interesting.
>
>Les Posen


At 12:51 PM -0400 6/13/02, Ed Dyer wrote:
>First, what OS-9 or X?  Win 98SE takes about 146MB max in Mac OS 9 
>and is pretty peppy on my Titanium G4 500, so should speed quite a 
>bit on the dual 450.  In Mac OS X, Win98SE CRAWLS when left alone, 
>compared to tolerable performance by Win2K Professional.
>
>In Mac OS 9, Win2K will take as much memory as you can throw at it 
>(in my case 512MB of 768) and still seem slow.  In Mac OS X, 
>performance is slightly less tolerable, but ok.
>
>Make sure to turn off some effects, MMX, and run in full screen mode 
>and it will be peppier.
>VPC 5.0.2 test system.
>Ed Dyer


At 8:23 AM -0700 6/13/02, David Crandon wrote:
>Well, if speed is of no importance, then 2000 would be good as it's a
>little more stable, etc. than W98. If speed is an issue at all, then buy
>him W98 and have him run in in OS9, which will be much faster than OSX.
>
>Also need to find out if the Windose programs need 2000 or not.
>
>David Crandon


At 9:51 AM -0500 6/13/02, Michael Winter wrote:
>Joe has a good point. It reminded me of a book that came out a few 
>years ago titled something like "The Mac User in a Windows World" 
>that was supposedly a great reference for people who used Macs, but 
>needed to deal Windows files, networking and IT people. Seems like 
>an updated version of a book like this would also be a great gift, 
>but I haven't been able to find anything like it. Just curious if 
>anyone on the list knows of an up-to-date equivalent.
>
>-Mike



At 8:08 AM -0400 6/13/02, Joe Ellis wrote:
>Before you invest the money in VPC for the Mac, you may want to consider
>what kind of Windows applications he is going to use in his job. If they are
>the standard for most business offices it will probably be M$ Office, Word,
>Excel, and Powerpoint. If that is the case you may be much better off
>getting him a copy of the Mac M$ Office suite. The files in the Office set
>of apps are completely interchangable between Windows and Macs regardless of
>OS versions. I usually don't have much use for Microsoft products, but their
>Office suite is excellent, the people they had working on it did an
>outstanding job. Besides Mac drives are capable of reading Windows formated
>disks and CDs so he doesn't even have to worry about interchangeability of
>media.
>
>Also from my experience with VPC 5.0.3 (the last version I worked with)
>there are some USB issues that have still not been resolved. I've run both
>Win 98 and Win 2000 on my G4 Quicksilver and have not been really happy with
>either one although the speed on Win 2000 is approaching that of 98.


At 10:41 PM -0500 6/11/02, Nick Scalise wrote:
>Based strictly on speed I would recommend getting the Win98 version. 
>It is faster in VPC than Win200.
>
>--
>Nick Scalise
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
 -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock!  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

G-List list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Macintosh? Get free email and more at Applelinks! 
<http://www.applelinks.com>

Reply via email to