Caitlin wrote: >So out of the two ZIFs I have, am I correct in thinking I can possibly >clock the G3/300 higher than the G3/266 (these are probably the same >exact chip aren't they? sigh)
The answer to your first question depends on how tolerant each of your CPUs is of being 'chipped. It may be the case that the 266 has more headroom and so can go further (percentage-wise) than the other CPU that already starts out faster. But I have no reason for why that would be, or if it even would be. But given that the 300 already has 37MHz on the slower one to begin with, it'll always be faster, if perhaps not always retain that 37 Mhz advantage if both were chipped. I'd say the answer to your second question is most likely "no", they really are different. Just not by too much (unless that 300 has 1MB of L2, which I doubt.) -David -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
