In a message dated 1/24/05 5:14:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Plase dont recommend Virtual PC, I tried it and hated it
>>[too complicated, too little time to fiddle around with it
>>and I can't to afford it anyway]
>
>One of the most relieble and simplest programs around for the task!!

I hate the way they made the volumes, they don't work like they used to, my 
version of OS X just wont open them (the new ones), I tried moving my old drive 
file completely I wanted to keep it intact, too much hassle I forget all the 
obstacles I found, my old drive ended up damaged and "too new" for the old 
version, couldn't downgrade it, a total failure and I lost all I used to have 
in 
my old Windows 98 drive, I ended up really angry.  I know Apple is under no 
responsibility, but we've always lived in a PC world, don't you think that's 
why 
they had to develop SoftPC SoftWindows and Virtual PC in the first place??  
Not to mention PC cards, solutions like this are being made all the time so 
your point was not made.

>---
>>I just want to play those old DOS games that were never ported
>>to the mac and can't be played on PC these days.
>
>An old PC will still be able to play them!

This is upsetting.  Whatever happened with the compatibility that Apple has 
always promised, back then (1990) when they spoke about compatibility, I really 
thought they would actually run DOS programs, which they never did, such a 
small program that fit in a 800k disk, why wouldn't they?  For the price Macs 
were selling they honestly could have.  That's why I had to later purchase 
Virtual PC 2.0, its too bad the program is too old for todays standards, I 
would 
still be using it.  Since then the only version that worked fine for me was 
5.0, 
anything newer sux.

>---
>>With such advanced technology these days I don't understand
>>how anyone has not written DOS for Mac.
>
>No-one has any use (commercial) for DOS, not even PC users!!
>Why should anyone write a commercial product for that, or even
>more unlikely, write it into the OS.
>
>Apple doesn't even support old Mac software like the old 680x0
>stuff from Classics and the like.

Again, people have forgotten those games because they can't run them in 
Windows, you don't seem to get it.  How come Nintendo releases PacMac for 
Gameboy 
and still sells like hotcakes?  I can still run several b/w games made around 
1986 in OS X under classic.  A load of them.  The reason why I do this is 
because as much as I LOVE the games these days, sometimes its nice to go back 
and 
play you cute little old games, its cool to brag to the PC users that I can 
still play old games in my "high end" OS X mac.

>---
>My advice, as you mentiuoned games, is to get a real PC for $25,
>a 486 or P1, at least that'll run it full speed!

Another fact to prove my point, why would I buy a bulky PC to play those 
games when I can do it in my Mac?  Think about what you just said.  I do have a 
PC 
here, a 433Mhz Windows 98 which DOESNT run them!

Thanks Larry, but do you really think you helped?  I am asking for a solution 
here you give me all the alternatives, this is definitely, absolutely 
un-Mac-y.

Lili

-- 
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
 -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock!  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

G-List list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com

Reply via email to