Or, by 2 Enoch do you mean two fragments of Aramaic Enoch? 2 Enoch generally refers to the Slavonic Book of Enoch, which we now know existed in Coptic. See http://enochseminar.org/#app=86a0&bda6-selectedIndex=5. It would be quite a discovery if it were identified among the Qumran manuscripts, particularly since its date (or dates) and provenance are uncertain.
David Suter Saint Martin's University From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Suter, David Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 10:44 AM To: 'Torleif Elgvin'; Søren Holst Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Megillot] 4QNeh 2 Enoch is an interesting one. I don't think that it came to the attention of the Enoch Seminar a year ago in Naples when they discussed 2 Enoch. What is there of that nature? David Suter Saint Martin's University From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Torleif Elgvin Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:37 AM To: Søren Holst Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Megillot] 4QNeh T&T Clark has quite extensive, but not fully updated information on its webside on this book. I am still quarrelling with my co-editor Esther Eshel on some of the identifications - if specific fragments belong to previous published scrolls or not. So ask me within a few months, I might have a more final list then. Here is some food for thought, on unpublished material: 2 Genesis, Exodus Seiyal Numeri 2 Deuteronomy 1QSamuel Another Samuel Kings Nehemiah Ruth Proverbs Jeremiah Joel 2 Enoch Torleif 2010/9/8 Søren Holst <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Is a lost of all of the Schøyen fragments available anywhere, Torleif? We all look forward to your edition of them, but just to give us something to think of meanwhile ... :-) kol tuv Søren -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] På vegne af Torleif Elgvin Sendt: 7. september 2010 08:19 Til: Ken Penner Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Emne: Re: [Megillot] 4QNeh Published on the web in 2009 by Charlesworth (www.ijco.org/?categoryId=28681<http://www.ijco.org/?categoryId=28681>). He probably had permission from Lee Biondi, who may have had access to the fragment at an earlier stage, without being the owner. The fragment now belongs to the Schøyen Collection, and will be published in a volume at T&T Clark with all the Schøyen fragments (more than 20, and more than a dozen not published before) in 2011. Torleif Elgvin 2010/9/6 Ken Penner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Could someone tell me where the Nehemiah fragment mentioned by VanderKam in DSST2, 49 ("not a single fragment from a copy of Nehemiah was identified until 2008") was published? Thanks, Ken _______________________________________________ g-Megillot mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
