On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Bruce Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Dan wrote:
>
>>
>> Which brings me back to my believe that Apple should do an open Mac
>> OS X,
>
>
> That's an underpants gnome business plan
>
> 1) Offer Open Mac OS X
> 2) ?
> 3) Profit!
>
> Selling OS'es is only profitable when you're getting manufacturers to
> install it on the computers they sell.

Marketing an already proven OS that has long been published but never
marketed for the system it was developed on in a market niche that
cries for something better is a gamble. one that could pay off big if
anyone had the guts to try.Since the technology has been worked out
long ago ALL that is needed is a miniuscule rewrite, some advertising
and some packaging.


>
> Microsoft would have NEVER EVER become the behemoth it is now by
> selling Windows to consumers as an add-on product. Their money has
> ALWAYS come from computer manufacturers paying them to pre-install
> Windows on their systems.

More income is more income. Becoming a behemoth is not the goal.
Providing a better OS in a market in dire need of one is a very worthy
goal. Whio gives a **** if it becomes an OEM for other manufacturers
there are real needs outside of the very cramped expectations of
platform elitists.
>
> Apple will never make more money letting Dell sell OS X computers than
> Apple selling OS X computers. This is the Clone Lesson.
>
> The clones NEVER expanded Apple's market share; they merely undercut
> Apple's profits.

Here i thought that THE " clone lesson " was develop your OS for the
future on the processors you intend to use years down the road without
alienating your user base. Set the stage for massive migration to
another CPU. Let developers get real good at it then forbid anyone to
use it on non kosher machines with the same CPU when you make your own
computers the ACTUAL CLONES!!!!!
>
> (all besides the fact that MS will never let Dell and HP get away with
> selling OS X computers rather than Windows ones.)

Just as MS FORBIDS them from making Linux machines?????  Hmmm?
>
> Apple's competitors are companies like Acer, HP and Dell, NOT MICROSOFT.

Oh you mean the same companies that ASUS clones the boards for that
Apple sells, right?


And since Microsoft owns the world Apple could not and should not
compete in that off the shelf PC OS market or the sky will fall?

Also an Apple OS on a PC would never be as good as Windows anyway. PC
users would see what a pile of crap An Apple OS is? Is that the point?
An Apple PC OS would never cut the mustard in the PC user market
right?

And if it did it would mean an end to Apple PC clone  ( Macs to us)
manufacture?  Like Apple does not have the money or smarts to stay in
the market, right?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to