On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM, tortoise<cymraeg...@gmail.com> wrote: >
> Clearly apple is a consumer company. Although the video industry > helps, many specialists have complained the intel macs are not so good > for them as the g5 was. (Intel centric) Benchmarks aside, this is user > experience. > Can you quote some examples of this or cite what the differences are? There is a common perception that the Intel Macs are way faster and more capable than the G5s of any spec. Are you saying specific G5s are faster or more stable than Intel Macs? This has been of concern on another list I am on where there is a discussion of the G5s being locked out of the Snow Leopard upgrade and what this will mean for those pros using G5s. > Even today a dual g4 can be as good or better performer as intel dual > core in certain applications (such as with g4 upgrades versus current > mini/ imac models = clunky consumer junk) That seems to go against the evidence of LEM machine profile bench marks. adrian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
